Condé Nast’s Deal with OpenAI: Is History Just Repeating Itself?
By Chen Pesses | September 12, 2024
In a move that signals a potential shift in the media landscape, Condé Nast licensed content to OpenAI to fuel ChatGPT and SearchGPT. This would be content from leading brands under Condé Nast, such as GQ, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and Vogue.
History Repeating Itself
Condé Nast is far from being alone in striking a deal with OpenAI. Major publishers such as The Associated Press and Vox Media have joined the band. It clearly indicates that many publishers are adopting an ‘if you can’t beat them join them’ strategy.
Meanwhile, others, like The New York Times, don’t shake hands with AI. They take a more aggressive approach, suing OpenAI and Microsoft for alleged copyright infringement.
Both strategies look similar to past technological disruptions to publishers. We’ve seen it before. As new technologies emerge, they simply utilize content without compensation. This leads to a scramble for deals that may be lucrative in the short term but often prove unsustainable in the long run.
Short-Term Gains vs. Long-Term Sustainability
It’s easy to understand why publishers, even the largest ones, are drawn to the short-term financial benefits. With audiences consuming content differently and traditional digital revenue streams drying up, a quick cash influx can be a lifesaver. Even Condé Nast’s CEO, Roger Lynch, admitted that the OpenAI partnership would help recoup losses from declining digital revenue. He also highlighted the importance of embracing new technologies and ensuring proper attribution with compensation for their content.
On the other side of the deal, for OpenAI, the benefits are also clear. Partnering with renowned publishers enhances the credibility and reliability of its AI products. By leveraging high-quality, well-sourced content, OpenAI can ensure that its users receive accurate and trustworthy information. As AI plays an increasingly important role in how people discover and engage with content, maintaining accuracy and integrity will be crucial.
The Future of AI and Publisher Partnerships
While the partnerships between publishers and AI companies may seem like pragmatic responses to a changing media landscape, the long-term implications remain unknown. As with past technological disruptions, it remains to be seen whether these deals will stand the test of time or become just another chapter in the ongoing saga of media adaptation to new technologies. The financial appeal is there, but the future of the industry is far from settled.
Latest Articles
-
Ad Blockers Are No Longer the Problem They Used to Be
Today, according to recent stats, 31.5% of internet users globally use ad blockers at least occasionally. While most traffic now comes from mobile devices, desktop still dominates ad blocking. This, of course, comes with considerable cost implications. Just this year, the popular use of ad blockers is estimated to cost publishers $54 billion in lost advertising revenue. But the situation isn’t as bad as it once was. Ad blocking is no longer a massive problem for publishers.
View Now -
Attention is Officially Becoming The New Tradable Currency
The days of vague attention metrics are officially over. The Media Rating Council (MRC) and The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) are finally teaming up to standardize attention measurement, marking a significant milestone in the publishing industry. At this stage accreditation guidelines are expected to roll out in early 2025, this is huge news for publishers, and it’s happening just in time.
View Now -
Court Rules: Google Has an Illegal Grip on the Search Market
Google Has an Illegal Grip on the Search Market As if the judge’s siding with the Department of Justice (DOJ) isn’t bad enough for Google, some of the evidence against the trust came from where nobody expected, its own witnesses in the trial.
View Now