Tailor your users’ ad experience with CONDITIONAL LAYOUTS
By Browsi | September 18, 2022
Your users are not the same, so why should their ad experience be the same?
Customize your website’s ad layouts, based on ANY conditional scenario, by using real time page parameters and user data.
Cater the ad layouts to different user types
Create different ad layouts based on your users loyalty or lifespan. Subscribers vs. non subscribers, new users vs. returning users will now get a different ad experience.
Adapt the ad experience to the page content
Implement unique ad units to fit with specific content (articles, sections, lengths or labels). For example, configure sport ad units in sport-related articles.
Set different ad layouts for different page formats
Match the perfect ad types and sizes to different page formats, such as magazine pages, pagination galleries or forum-based pages.
Let’s schedule a 15-min call to walk you through our Conditional Layout feature to customize your users’ ad experience.
Latest Articles
-
The 6-step framework for turning signals into strategy
Competitive intelligence only matters if it leads to action. In this edition of The Polaris Playbook, we use Honda and five competitors to demonstrate a practical six-step framework for turning competitive signals into strategic recommendations marketers can actually use.
View Now -
How to Detect Advertiser Spend Drops Before They Hit
Etsy's earnings confirmed what PolarisAI had already seen: a major pullback in marketing investment. By analyzing competitive signals before quarterly results were released, PolarisAI projected a 38% decline in spend while the market was still reacting to the underlying changes. The result highlights a growing reality for marketers: the most valuable competitive insights often emerge long before earnings calls explain them.
View Now -
How Accurate is Browsi’s Data? Tried and Tested.
Most marketers trust competitive spend data without questioning where the numbers come from. We tested PolarisAI Engine™ against the only benchmark that matters: what advertisers actually reported in their earnings calls. The result was an 87% correlation across five major brands, revealing the difference between data that looks confident and data grounded in reality.
View Now