Back to all blog posts

Condé Nast’s Deal with OpenAI: Is History Just Repeating Itself?

By Chen Pesses | September 12, 2024

In a move that signals a potential shift in the media landscape, Condé Nast licensed content to OpenAI to fuel ChatGPT and SearchGPT. This would be content from leading brands under Condé Nast, such as GQ, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and Vogue.

 

History Repeating Itself

Condé Nast is far from being alone in striking a deal with OpenAI. Major publishers such as The Associated Press and Vox Media have joined the band. It clearly indicates that many publishers are adopting an ‘if you can’t beat them join them’ strategy. 

Meanwhile, others, like The New York Times, don’t shake hands with AI. They take a more aggressive approach, suing OpenAI and Microsoft for alleged copyright infringement.

Both strategies look similar to past technological disruptions to publishers. We’ve seen it before. As new technologies emerge, they simply utilize content without compensation. This leads to a scramble for deals that may be lucrative in the short term but often prove unsustainable in the long run.

 

Short-Term Gains vs. Long-Term Sustainability

It’s easy to understand why publishers, even the largest ones, are drawn to the short-term financial benefits. With audiences consuming content differently and traditional digital revenue streams drying up, a quick cash influx can be a lifesaver. Even Condé Nast’s CEO, Roger Lynch, admitted that the OpenAI partnership would help recoup losses from declining digital revenue. He also highlighted the importance of embracing new technologies and ensuring proper attribution with compensation for their content.

On the other side of the deal, for OpenAI, the benefits are also clear. Partnering with renowned publishers enhances the credibility and reliability of its AI products. By leveraging high-quality, well-sourced content, OpenAI can ensure that its users receive accurate and trustworthy information. As AI plays an increasingly important role in how people discover and engage with content, maintaining accuracy and integrity will be crucial.

 

The Future of AI and Publisher Partnerships

While the partnerships between publishers and AI companies may seem like pragmatic responses to a changing media landscape, the long-term implications remain unknown. As with past technological disruptions, it remains to be seen whether these deals will stand the test of time or become just another chapter in the ongoing saga of media adaptation to new technologies. The financial appeal is there, but the future of the industry is far from settled.

 

Latest Articles

  • How Accurate is Browsi’s Data? Tried and Tested.

    Most marketers trust competitive spend data without questioning where the numbers come from. We tested PolarisAI Engine™ against the only benchmark that matters: what advertisers actually reported in their earnings calls. The result was an 87% correlation across five major brands, revealing the difference between data that looks confident and data grounded in reality.

    View Now
  • Insurance is Boring. Their Social Spend Isn’t.

    Insurance products may look the same, but advertising performance doesn’t. In this edition of the Polaris Playbook, we analyze how Progressive, GEICO, Allstate, Liberty Mutual, and Nationwide allocate social ad spend — and uncover why Progressive’s CPM is more than 50% lower than competitors despite being the category’s biggest spender. The data reveals a broader competitive advantage hidden inside the auction itself.

    View Now
  • Most brands think they are data driven. They’re not.

    In this breakdown, we use PolarisAI to compare American Express and PayPal, uncovering how PayPal achieved comparable performance with dramatically lower spend through smarter targeting, simpler messaging, and more efficient execution.

    View Now