In Real-Estate and in AdTech – Location is (Almost) Everything
By Asaf Shamly | May 27, 2025
You can have the best ad in the world – high-performing creative, long time in view, shown to an engaged user.
But if it’s squeezed between seven other ads on a cluttered page? It’s not going to land.
That’s the part we don’t talk about enough. The environment. The layout. The density. The visual noise around the impression.
Let’s talk about two under appreciated KPIs that shape that environment.
1. Ad Density: When more means less
Ad density is the ratio of 𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 on a page.
Higher density means more ads competing for a user’s attention – and often, for space.
From a revenue perspective, this might seem smart.
More ads = more dollars.
But in reality, more ads often leads to lower attention per ad, poorer user experience, and reduced performance over time.
We’ve seen this play out across entertainment, lifestyle, and even news websites: cluttered sidebars, stacked banners, mid-article interstitials.
The users don’t remember the brands.
They just remember being annoyed.
Everyone loses.
2. Ad Clutter: Cramming too much within one fold
Too often, publishers cram as many ads as possible into folds.
The result?
Not one ad stands out.
And even if one gets seen, it’s often lost in the noise.
This isn’t about minimalism as a form of art (though, I do like that form).
It’s about clarity.
Focus.
Breathing room.
The best-performing ad placements aren’t always the most aggressive ones.
They’re the ones that respect the user and his experience.
My point? Context is quality
When you evaluate inventory, look at KPIs determining the setting.
Is the ad given space to stand out?
Is it surrounded by clutter?
Is it competing with popups, autoplay videos, and a dozen other distractions?
Attention is limited. And patience? Even more so.
Wrapping the series: A more practical definition of quality
So, where does all this leave us?
Ad quality isn’t a single number. It’s an open list of signals that go beyond viewability and having a pulse.
Signals that can help us understand how well an ad was shown and if it stood a real chance of being seen, felt, and god forbid, even remembered.
Clarity is healthy.
That may not be good for everyone.
But in this industry, clarity can be the meaning of 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆.
Latest Articles
-
The Doctor Everyone’s Seeing: YouTube, AI Search, and the New Rules of Visibility
Google’s AI Overviews are reshaping discovery by deciding which sources appear in answers — often before users ever click. As search shifts from clicks to citations, traditional performance metrics no longer tell the full story. This article explores what visibility really means in an AI-mediated web, and why competitive intelligence is now essential.
View Now -
The Vanishing Web: What Google’s Admission Really Means for Advertisers
For years, Google insisted the open web was thriving. Then, in a legal filing, it admitted the opposite. For advertisers, the real risk isn’t where ads run, but how much of what happens around them can still be seen, understood, and measured.
View Now -
What the RSL Standard Signals About the Future of Visibility in 2026
When Reddit, Yahoo, Medium, and several of the web’s biggest content platforms announced a new Really Simple Licensing (RSL) standard, most coverage focused on the politics: platforms finally demanding compensation from AI companies; a new legal framework for training data; the good old open-web fight. But if you take one step back, something bigger comes into focus. For the first time, publishers are trying to engineer visibility - not for users, but for AI agents. And advertisers should be paying attention.
View Now