Back to all blog posts

In Real-Estate and in AdTech – Location is (Almost) Everything

By Asaf Shamly | May 27, 2025

You can have the best ad in the world – high-performing creative, long time in view, shown to an engaged user. 

But if it’s squeezed between seven other ads on a cluttered page? It’s not going to land.

That’s the part we don’t talk about enough. The environment. The layout. The density. The visual noise around the impression.

Let’s talk about two under appreciated KPIs that shape that environment.

1. Ad Density: When more means less

Ad density is the ratio of 𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 on a page. 

Higher density means more ads competing for a user’s attention – and often, for space.

From a revenue perspective, this might seem smart. 

More ads = more dollars. 

But in reality, more ads often leads to lower attention per ad, poorer user experience, and reduced performance over time.

We’ve seen this play out across entertainment, lifestyle, and even news websites: cluttered sidebars, stacked banners, mid-article interstitials. 

The users don’t remember the brands. 

They just remember being annoyed.

Everyone loses. 

2. Ad Clutter: Cramming too much within one fold

Too often, publishers cram as many ads as possible into folds.

The result? 

Not one ad stands out. 

And even if one gets seen, it’s often lost in the noise.

This isn’t about minimalism as a form of art (though, I do like that form). 

It’s about clarity. 

Focus. 

Breathing room. 

The best-performing ad placements aren’t always the most aggressive ones.

They’re the ones that respect the user and his experience.

My point? Context is quality

When you evaluate inventory, look at KPIs determining the setting. 

Is the ad given space to stand out? 

Is it surrounded by clutter? 

Is it competing with popups, autoplay videos, and a dozen other distractions?

Attention is limited. And patience? Even more so.

Wrapping the series: A more practical definition of quality

So, where does all this leave us?

Ad quality isn’t a single number. It’s an open list of signals that go beyond viewability and having a pulse.

Signals that can help us understand how well an ad was shown and if it stood a real chance of being seen, felt, and god forbid, even remembered.

Clarity is healthy.

That may not be good for everyone.

But in this industry, clarity can be the meaning of 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆.

 

Latest Articles

  • The Open Web Just Got More Transparent (Sort Of)

    OpenSincera is a bold step toward greater transparency in MarTech. This free API gives open access to inventory data across the web, signaling a shift toward more informed planning and smarter decision-making. But how far does this visibility really go - and what comes next for advertisers, publishers, and the open web?

    View Now
  • If an Ad Falls in the Forest, Was it Ever Really Seen?

    You’ve heard the standard: 50% of an ad’s pixels, in view, for at least one continuous second. That’s the industry benchmark for viewability. It’s also the bare minimum. And it tells us very little about whether a user actually saw the ad - let alone engaged with it or remembered it.

    View Now
  • We All Think We Know What Ad Quality is. But Could There Be More Than What Meets the Eye?

    Let’s start with what everyone agrees on: ad quality matters. It matters for advertisers trying to get results. It matters for publishers looking to maintain credibility. And it matters for the end users - yes, the ones we’re all supposedly optimizing for - who just want to read the content they came for without being bombarded, interrupted, or ignored.

    View Now