The Open Internet and Direct Deals are Making a Quiet Comeback
By Asaf Shamly | October 8, 2024
Since 2021, open programmatic ad spending has barely grown by 3% while the walled gardens – think Google and Amazon – have surged ahead with 10% growth. This gap raises questions about the future of the open internet. But, against this data, there are signs this landscape may become more balanced.
A closer look at a natural evolution
The open internet and programmatic advertising relationship status has always been “complicated”. For a long time, the balance of power has tilted in favor of walled gardens. This isn’t surprising or sudden. It’s a natural consequence of market consolidation. However, there are indications of a change in trend.
Take for example Connected TV (CTV) advertising. It has emerged as a powerful force, combining the reach of traditional media with the precision of digital targeting. This has opened up new opportunities for the open internet to compete. Companies like The Trade Desk are leading the change, demonstrating the potential for the open internet to regain ground.
Shifting back to direct deals?
Now here’s the interesting part – we’re seeing more publishers and brands moving back to direct deals. Why? Programmatic, while great for scale, often leaves publishers with less profit because of all of the middlemen involved. Brands, especially the big ones, are moving back to direct deals also because they love the transparency of knowing exactly what they’re buying and from whom. Big publishers are increasingly recognizing this shift and seizing that opportunity to take back control of their ad inventory.
The fall of MFA publishers
The decline of Made for Advertising (MFA) publishers has also contributed to this shift towards direct deals. These publishers often rely on arbitrage, acquiring users without offering substantial value. As brands and agencies became aware of the inefficiencies associated with MFA publishers, they began to allocate their budgets elsewhere.
This realization has only pushed big brands further towards direct deals.
After all, why gamble with MFA publishers when you can strike a deal directly with a trusted, high-quality publisher? It’s a much more straightforward and effective strategy for everyone involved.
What’s next?
The ongoing Google antitrust trial could have a significant impact on the future of adtech. A potential breakup of Google’s ad business could create a more level playing field for smaller supply-side platforms (SSPs) and demand-side platforms (DSPs), as well as potentially driving more publishers toward direct deals. This would further empower the open internet by giving publishers greater control over their ad inventory and reducing the dominance of the walled gardens.
Latest Articles
-
Why Bad News Gets Clicks (But Doesn’t Always Pay)
We’re naturally drawn to bad news but when it comes to ad dollars, it’s not always so straightforward. Read this article to explore why bad news gets clicks but doesn’t always pay and what really impacts engagement and ad revenue.
View Now -
Why Perplexity AI’s Approach Might Be Its Downfall in the Battle with News Corp
News Corp is accusing Perplexity of using its articles to fuel search results without permission in a move that crosses copyright red lines. In other words, News Corp is saying Perplexity is taking advantage of news content without contributing anything back. This type of accusation isn’t the first and probably not the last in the gray area of AI.
View Now -
Ad Blockers Are No Longer the Problem They Used to Be
Today, according to recent stats, 31.5% of internet users globally use ad blockers at least occasionally. While most traffic now comes from mobile devices, desktop still dominates ad blocking. This, of course, comes with considerable cost implications. Just this year, the popular use of ad blockers is estimated to cost publishers $54 billion in lost advertising revenue. But the situation isn’t as bad as it once was. Ad blocking is no longer a massive problem for publishers.
View Now