Will Sell-Side Curation Leave Publishers Behind?
By Asaf Shamly | January 15, 2025
Sell-side curation is now the latest buzz in ad tech.
Sure, it’s not a brand-new idea (sellers defined audiences, anyone?), but it’s gaining traction like never before – especially with major players like Google Ad Manager stepping in.
When a giant like Google makes a move, it’s a clear signal the industry is taking curation seriously.
But what does this mean for publishers? And will Google’s influence drive meaningful change – or just more control for middlemen?
While it’s being hailed as a win for publishers taking more control over who sees their ads, we can’t ignore the elephant in the room: sell-side curation might just be another power grab by SSPs to stay relevant.
A Game of Power and Positioning
At its core, sell-side curation feels like SSPs are trying to differentiate themselves and claw back influence from DSPs.
In a way, it’s smart – SSPs are asserting their value, trying to differentiate themselves from one another, ensuring they remain critical to the ecosystem.
But let’s not kid ourselves: I think publishers may be at risk here.
If SSPs dominate curation, they’ll have the leverage to control the data and audiences publishers rely on. That could leave publishers with less bargaining power – and fewer rewards from their own inventory.
Publishers: Don’t Get Left Behind (Again)
Here’s my concern:
While SSPs and curation houses promise higher CPMs and better deal-making, publishers often get sidelined by these innovations.
To really benefit from curation, publishers need to own their data.
The future of programmatic advertising belongs to those who understand their audiences deeply and can offer data-based curated packages that advertisers actually want.
If publishers don’t step up now, curation might just become another missed opportunity, with intermediaries reaping the rewards.
So, while the hype is justified, let’s ensure it’s a win for everyone – not just another SSP power play.
Practically speaking, what can publishers do?
– Invest in first-party data strategies to know their audiences inside out.
– Collaborate with SSPs that align with their goals, not just their bottom line.
– Proactively package curated inventory that advertisers can’t ignore.
As an industry, we owe it to ourselves to make this transition fair and inclusive.
Otherwise, what’s the point?
Latest Articles
-
The Doctor Everyone’s Seeing: YouTube, AI Search, and the New Rules of Visibility
Google’s AI Overviews are reshaping discovery by deciding which sources appear in answers — often before users ever click. As search shifts from clicks to citations, traditional performance metrics no longer tell the full story. This article explores what visibility really means in an AI-mediated web, and why competitive intelligence is now essential.
View Now -
The Vanishing Web: What Google’s Admission Really Means for Advertisers
For years, Google insisted the open web was thriving. Then, in a legal filing, it admitted the opposite. For advertisers, the real risk isn’t where ads run, but how much of what happens around them can still be seen, understood, and measured.
View Now -
What the RSL Standard Signals About the Future of Visibility in 2026
When Reddit, Yahoo, Medium, and several of the web’s biggest content platforms announced a new Really Simple Licensing (RSL) standard, most coverage focused on the politics: platforms finally demanding compensation from AI companies; a new legal framework for training data; the good old open-web fight. But if you take one step back, something bigger comes into focus. For the first time, publishers are trying to engineer visibility - not for users, but for AI agents. And advertisers should be paying attention.
View Now