Will Sell-Side Curation Leave Publishers Behind?
By Asaf Shamly | January 15, 2025
Sell-side curation is now the latest buzz in ad tech.
Sure, it’s not a brand-new idea (sellers defined audiences, anyone?), but it’s gaining traction like never before – especially with major players like Google Ad Manager stepping in.
When a giant like Google makes a move, it’s a clear signal the industry is taking curation seriously.
But what does this mean for publishers? And will Google’s influence drive meaningful change – or just more control for middlemen?
While it’s being hailed as a win for publishers taking more control over who sees their ads, we can’t ignore the elephant in the room: sell-side curation might just be another power grab by SSPs to stay relevant.
A Game of Power and Positioning
At its core, sell-side curation feels like SSPs are trying to differentiate themselves and claw back influence from DSPs.
In a way, it’s smart – SSPs are asserting their value, trying to differentiate themselves from one another, ensuring they remain critical to the ecosystem.
But let’s not kid ourselves: I think publishers may be at risk here.
If SSPs dominate curation, they’ll have the leverage to control the data and audiences publishers rely on. That could leave publishers with less bargaining power – and fewer rewards from their own inventory.
Publishers: Don’t Get Left Behind (Again)
Here’s my concern:
While SSPs and curation houses promise higher CPMs and better deal-making, publishers often get sidelined by these innovations.
To really benefit from curation, publishers need to own their data.
The future of programmatic advertising belongs to those who understand their audiences deeply and can offer data-based curated packages that advertisers actually want.
If publishers don’t step up now, curation might just become another missed opportunity, with intermediaries reaping the rewards.
So, while the hype is justified, let’s ensure it’s a win for everyone – not just another SSP power play.
Practically speaking, what can publishers do?
– Invest in first-party data strategies to know their audiences inside out.
– Collaborate with SSPs that align with their goals, not just their bottom line.
– Proactively package curated inventory that advertisers can’t ignore.
As an industry, we owe it to ourselves to make this transition fair and inclusive.
Otherwise, what’s the point?
Latest Articles
-
How to Detect Advertiser Spend Drops Before They Hit
Etsy's earnings confirmed what PolarisAI had already seen: a major pullback in marketing investment. By analyzing competitive signals before quarterly results were released, PolarisAI projected a 38% decline in spend while the market was still reacting to the underlying changes. The result highlights a growing reality for marketers: the most valuable competitive insights often emerge long before earnings calls explain them.
View Now -
How Accurate is Browsi’s Data? Tried and Tested.
Most marketers trust competitive spend data without questioning where the numbers come from. We tested PolarisAI Engine™ against the only benchmark that matters: what advertisers actually reported in their earnings calls. The result was an 87% correlation across five major brands, revealing the difference between data that looks confident and data grounded in reality.
View Now -
Insurance is Boring. Their Social Spend Isn’t.
Insurance products may look the same, but advertising performance doesn’t. In this edition of the Polaris Playbook, we analyze how Progressive, GEICO, Allstate, Liberty Mutual, and Nationwide allocate social ad spend — and uncover why Progressive’s CPM is more than 50% lower than competitors despite being the category’s biggest spender. The data reveals a broader competitive advantage hidden inside the auction itself.
View Now